Title: December 7, 2005
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax them to (661)825-8880.
Q. I heard that several people caught Hepatitis A from patronizing a local restaurant. A member of my family went there not long ago. I am very concerned for my family’s health. What is the restaurant’s liability for making people sick from contaminated food?
A. If getting Hepatitis A can be traced to contaminated food from this restaurant, the owner(s) of the restaurant will be liable for any damages sustained as a result of catching this dreadful disease. Infected individuals can unknowingly infect others two weeks prior to feeling ill themselves. So you are justified in being concerned. Damages the restaurant’s owners can be sued for include medical care, income loss, pain and suffering, mental anguish, loss of consortium, etc. Hepatitis A is a serious disease and kills approximately 100 people in this country every year. Tracing of the origins of the disease must be confirmed however before filing any lawsuits. So, you must be sure that the disease was contracted due to contaminated food or unsanitary conditions at this restaurant.
Q. My son rides on a school bus everyday. Because the bus driver has ill feelings towards my son, he must sit in the front row everyday. I was informed by him that because he is in the front row, he can see everything in front of the bus and what the driver is doing while driving the bus. The driver is constantly watching the rear of the bus through her back view mirror instead of watching where she is driving the bus. Not long ago, she almost hit a child who was right in front of the bus. I am fearful that this driver is going to cause an accident pretty soon while she has several children as passengers. What can be done about this?
A. First and foremost, I would let her supervisor know that her driving is dangerous. It is indeed the duty of a school bus driver to ensure that the kids in her care behave. But, her first duty is to ensure their safety. If supervision of the children becomes her primary focus, then she needs to have a driver who will focus on driving the bus. By notifying her supervisor, the school district will become aware of the dangers the children are facing while in this bus driver’s care. If an accident does occur, the school district will become liable through the “respondeat superior” theory which means that the employer becomes liable for damages incurred as a result of their employee’s negligence while she is working.
Showing posts with label liable. Show all posts
Showing posts with label liable. Show all posts
Thursday, March 12, 2009
Monday, January 5, 2009
Legal Eaze #21 Pregnant/ Collections Agency
Originally Printed: May 4, 2005
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com.
Q. I am 16 years old and pregnant. My boyfriend is 18 years old. My parents like him and do not want to press charges against him. My parents and I are worried that the hospital staff at the hospital I go to when it is time to give birth will call the police on my boyfriend. Can the hospital staff do that? Or it is up to my parents?
A. My understanding of criminal law is that no one goes forward with a criminal filing unless there is a complaining victim. Mandated reporting is for child abuse only, not for impregnation of a minor, even if in violation of statutory rape laws. Please note that I am a “civil” general practitioner and only handle minor criminal matters. You would be best served by asking an attorney who handles criminal matters of all kinds.
Q. There is a man from a collection agency who keeps calling me with regards to an old debt dating back over 10 years ago. I have told him to leave me alone but he keeps bothering me at home. Somehow, he found out my boyfriend’s telephone number and he calls me there as well. It is legal for this collection agency to keep calling me like this?
A. I believe the Statute of Limitations on the debt may have expired. This collection agency can no longer collect on the debt. If you had a written contract with regards to this debt, the Statute of Limitations expired four years after you entered the contract, or four years after you made the last payment on the debt, whichever comes later. If you did not have a written contract, then two years is the applicable Statute of Limitations period. The collection agency may be liable for unfair debt collection practices and it would behoove you to take down the name, address and telephone number of this collection agency so that you can obtain court redress at a later date. It would be difficult for you to sue a collection agency if you do not know its name and contact information.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com.
Q. I am 16 years old and pregnant. My boyfriend is 18 years old. My parents like him and do not want to press charges against him. My parents and I are worried that the hospital staff at the hospital I go to when it is time to give birth will call the police on my boyfriend. Can the hospital staff do that? Or it is up to my parents?
A. My understanding of criminal law is that no one goes forward with a criminal filing unless there is a complaining victim. Mandated reporting is for child abuse only, not for impregnation of a minor, even if in violation of statutory rape laws. Please note that I am a “civil” general practitioner and only handle minor criminal matters. You would be best served by asking an attorney who handles criminal matters of all kinds.
Q. There is a man from a collection agency who keeps calling me with regards to an old debt dating back over 10 years ago. I have told him to leave me alone but he keeps bothering me at home. Somehow, he found out my boyfriend’s telephone number and he calls me there as well. It is legal for this collection agency to keep calling me like this?
A. I believe the Statute of Limitations on the debt may have expired. This collection agency can no longer collect on the debt. If you had a written contract with regards to this debt, the Statute of Limitations expired four years after you entered the contract, or four years after you made the last payment on the debt, whichever comes later. If you did not have a written contract, then two years is the applicable Statute of Limitations period. The collection agency may be liable for unfair debt collection practices and it would behoove you to take down the name, address and telephone number of this collection agency so that you can obtain court redress at a later date. It would be difficult for you to sue a collection agency if you do not know its name and contact information.
Sunday, January 4, 2009
Legal Eaze #17 Water Runoff/Animal Regulation
Originally Printed: March 9, 2005
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 12 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com.
Q. Our house sits in the middle of a small valley formation which has a caused us substantial problems with all the rain we’ve had. The runoff comes right to our back door. I dug a canal leading from the top of our backyard all the way to one side of my property, on the line between my neighbor’s property and ours. Since our entire property is on an incline going down toward the road, I figured the water will just go straight down to the road and keep going down the hill. My neighbor informed me that the water runoff is now coming straight at his house and he is very angry. What do we do?
A. By digging a canal to let the water runoff go to the side of your property instead of right at your house, you have created a monster. First of all, your house was obviously built in the wrong place. Second, you cannot divert your problem to your neighbor. Although I am not a builder, you should continue digging the canal all the way to the road. A soon as the weather permits, you should install “French gulches” going around both sides of your house all the way to the road. If you have caused damage to your neighbor’s property, you are liable for such damages. If you bought this house from someone else, they should have told you that you would have a big problem during the rainy season. However, to be frank, this problem should have been obvious the minute you bought this house or had it built.
Q. As I was walking in my neighborhood with my two little dogs on a leash, a large dog came out of a front yard and attacked my dogs. While I tried to protect my animals, the black bit me on the leg. One of my dogs had a huge gash on its hip and my other dog managed to get loose and ran away. He came home after spending 24 hours in the rain and developed a bad cough. I went by the house where the dog lives, but there’s never anyone there. What can I do?
A. You need to call the Department of Animal Regulation and make a complaint. They will investigate. However, in order to get reimbursed for your bit and the veterinary care of your animals, you need to find out who owns the house and who owns the dob. That person is liable for your damages. The law is very clear in that dogs must be restrained and if someone is injured by a loose dog, its owner is strictly liable.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 12 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com.
Q. Our house sits in the middle of a small valley formation which has a caused us substantial problems with all the rain we’ve had. The runoff comes right to our back door. I dug a canal leading from the top of our backyard all the way to one side of my property, on the line between my neighbor’s property and ours. Since our entire property is on an incline going down toward the road, I figured the water will just go straight down to the road and keep going down the hill. My neighbor informed me that the water runoff is now coming straight at his house and he is very angry. What do we do?
A. By digging a canal to let the water runoff go to the side of your property instead of right at your house, you have created a monster. First of all, your house was obviously built in the wrong place. Second, you cannot divert your problem to your neighbor. Although I am not a builder, you should continue digging the canal all the way to the road. A soon as the weather permits, you should install “French gulches” going around both sides of your house all the way to the road. If you have caused damage to your neighbor’s property, you are liable for such damages. If you bought this house from someone else, they should have told you that you would have a big problem during the rainy season. However, to be frank, this problem should have been obvious the minute you bought this house or had it built.
Q. As I was walking in my neighborhood with my two little dogs on a leash, a large dog came out of a front yard and attacked my dogs. While I tried to protect my animals, the black bit me on the leg. One of my dogs had a huge gash on its hip and my other dog managed to get loose and ran away. He came home after spending 24 hours in the rain and developed a bad cough. I went by the house where the dog lives, but there’s never anyone there. What can I do?
A. You need to call the Department of Animal Regulation and make a complaint. They will investigate. However, in order to get reimbursed for your bit and the veterinary care of your animals, you need to find out who owns the house and who owns the dob. That person is liable for your damages. The law is very clear in that dogs must be restrained and if someone is injured by a loose dog, its owner is strictly liable.
Legal Eaze #15 Fireplace/ Community Property
Originally Printed: February 23, 2005
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 12 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com.
Q. Recently we had our fireplace replaced, only to find out that it smokes and leaves soot on the masonry. All of our attempts to contact the manufacturer and have the problem fixed have been unsuccessful. What do we do?
A. Did the manufacturer install the fireplace or did you have someone else install it? It is possible that the installer did not follow the manufacturer’s instructions, in which case it is the installer who needs to fix the problem rather than the manufacturer. If the manufacturer provided the installation as well, you need to find out how much it would cost to fix the problem and have an attorney write a letter to the manufacturer, specifically requesting the amount it would cost to fix the problem so that you can hire your own repair person if the manufacturer refuses to fix it. If the attorney letter is ignored, then you should sue the manufacturer in Small Claims Court, if the amount is less than $7,500. Small Claims Court is very informal and the fastest way to get results in court without an attorney.
Q. I have read somewhere that California is a “community property” state. What does that mean?
A. It means that when you are married, you develop a community estate during the marriage. Both spouses’ income is considered community property, that is, each spouse is entitled to half of the income made by the other. If you purchase a house during the marriage, each spouse owns half of the equity developed during the marriage. Same goes with a car, furniture, stocks, bonds, jewelry and various other assets. Each party is also liable for the debts incurred by the family. However, such debts are not necessarily divided in half if a divorce eventually is granted because it depends on the income of each party and which party incurred each debt, as well as which party the debt benefited. Generally speaking, both spouses are entitled to half of everything that was acquired during the marriage. However, certain assets could be considered separate property if acquired with inherited or bequested money. An inheritance or bequest is separate property of the party who obtained it through death of a family member.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 12 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com.
Q. Recently we had our fireplace replaced, only to find out that it smokes and leaves soot on the masonry. All of our attempts to contact the manufacturer and have the problem fixed have been unsuccessful. What do we do?
A. Did the manufacturer install the fireplace or did you have someone else install it? It is possible that the installer did not follow the manufacturer’s instructions, in which case it is the installer who needs to fix the problem rather than the manufacturer. If the manufacturer provided the installation as well, you need to find out how much it would cost to fix the problem and have an attorney write a letter to the manufacturer, specifically requesting the amount it would cost to fix the problem so that you can hire your own repair person if the manufacturer refuses to fix it. If the attorney letter is ignored, then you should sue the manufacturer in Small Claims Court, if the amount is less than $7,500. Small Claims Court is very informal and the fastest way to get results in court without an attorney.
Q. I have read somewhere that California is a “community property” state. What does that mean?
A. It means that when you are married, you develop a community estate during the marriage. Both spouses’ income is considered community property, that is, each spouse is entitled to half of the income made by the other. If you purchase a house during the marriage, each spouse owns half of the equity developed during the marriage. Same goes with a car, furniture, stocks, bonds, jewelry and various other assets. Each party is also liable for the debts incurred by the family. However, such debts are not necessarily divided in half if a divorce eventually is granted because it depends on the income of each party and which party incurred each debt, as well as which party the debt benefited. Generally speaking, both spouses are entitled to half of everything that was acquired during the marriage. However, certain assets could be considered separate property if acquired with inherited or bequested money. An inheritance or bequest is separate property of the party who obtained it through death of a family member.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)