Showing posts with label pregnant. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pregnant. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Legal Eaze #82 Pregnancy Affair/Work Without Pay/Unpatented Product

Title: December 12, 2007

Q. I dated a married woman last year. We had sexual relations on several occasions. She told me that she had a platonic relationship with her husband. Before we stopped seeing each other, she informed me that I got her pregnant. She is about to give birth to the child. If this child is mine, I want to be involved in its life, but I have not seen or talked to this woman for several months. How can I become involved in raising my child?

A. How do you know that it is your child? Are you certain? You would need to have a DNA test performed on the child, the woman and you. As I am sure you realize, this might be cause for a breakup of this woman’s marriage. Maybe her relationship with her husband was not what she portrayed it to be. If the child is not yours, your willingness to re-insert yourself back into her life may cause problems for a lot of people. As it stands right now, the child is presumed to be her husband’s child. If she is not contacting you, she might not want her husband to know she had an affair with you. No matter what, I believe it is a mistake for you to force the issue. Stay out of her life right now. Believe me, she will contact you if you are the father of the child.

Q. Can my employer require that I work on the weekends without pay?

A. Your employer can ask you, but you can say no. You are not required to work without pay. You are entitled to compensation for all work performed for your employer. If you do not get paid for overtime, you can file a claim with the Labor Commission. If you are being retaliated against for having filed a claim with the Labor Board, this could be the basis for a civil lawsuit against your employer.

Q. I invented a product that can be used in a commercial kitchen. I have a meeting next week with the general manager of a large restaurant chain in Los Angeles to demonstrate my product. I do not have a patent for this product. What if this company steals my idea? How do I protect myself?

A. You should have a non-disclosure Agreement for the manager to sign. These agreements are very common. If he refuses to sign it, do not demonstrate the product. You can get a “provisional” application for patent at a minimal cost. This is good for one year. In the meantime, you can market the product to various companies. If it sells, then you should get a patent ASAP.

Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 14 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661) 825-8880

Monday, March 23, 2009

Legal Eaze #56 Underage Father/New Management Rules/Fingerprinting Clients

Title: October 11, 2006

Q. My brother who is 17 years old had sex with a woman who is 5 years his senior. She is now pregnant. Is he going to be responsible for child support? Isn’t this adult woman’s actions punishable by law?

A. If the woman gives birth to the child, your brother is the father of that child and yes, he will have to support this child. It is not the child’s fault that he was born. Parents of a child are responsible for supporting their children. On the other hand, sex with a minor is considered a crime, statutory rape to be exact, and this woman should be prosecuted to the extent of the law.

Q. The apartment building I live in has gone through a change of ownership lately. The previous manager resigned and a new manager moved in. Some of my neighbors were told by the new manager they no longer can keep a dog over 15 lbs. and have 30 days to either get rid of the dog, move out voluntarily or be evicted. These people have lived here for a year or more, some as long as 5 years. Others have been told that their satellite dishes installed on the roofs were no longer allowed. Shouldn’t these new rules apply only to new tenants who moved in after the change of ownership?

A. The new owner needs to enter into a new Rental Agreement with all the tenants if he wants to enforce new rules on the “old” tenants. Otherwise he is stepping into the shoes of the previous owner and cannot change the rules already in place. In addition, Under an FCC rule promulgated pursuant to the Telecommunications Act of 1996, landlords cannot prohibit tenants from installing satellite dishes, antennas or other telecommunications devices on the property.

Q. Is it legal for a business to insist on fingerprinting a client for identification? And should the client refuse to be fingerprinted isn’t the business denying him service? Wouldn’t this be a temptation to the technologically savvy unethical employee to use this information to steal the client’s identity?

A. I do not believe there is a law against fingerprinting clients, however, I would certainly refuse to do business with anyone who insist on fingerprinting me before I buy something from them as an extreme invasion of privacy. You have the right not to patronize a merchant who insists on doing so. However, if this has to do with obtaining a deed, a notary must take your fingerprint, a requirement by law. Often, a bank will require a fingerprint on the back of a check being cashed if you are not a bank customer.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 14 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880

Friday, February 27, 2009

Legal Eaze #25 Schizophrenia Again/Paternity

Title: June 29, 2005

Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com.

A very nice lady wrote me a letter about the schizophrenic young man I talked about in my last “Legal Eaze” column. She informed me that there are very few available hospital beds for the mentally ill, and they are only available for the most seriously mentally ill, i.e. must be s serious danger to self, to others or gravely disabled, in other words cannot feed, shelter and dress themselves.

She explained that she has a son who has been ill with schizophrenia for 28 years and it has been a long and difficult road in attempting to provide the help and the care her son requires. She suggested that the only legal solution available to desperate parents is to obtain a restraining order against a mentally ill adult child. Obviously, this would entail homelessness or ending up in the criminal justice system. Our jails and prisons are filled with mentally-ill inmates, who in the past were cared for in state hospitals. Unfortunately, these state hospitals have pretty much been all closed, leaving the mental patients to fend for themselves. However, she mentioned Luann Baldwin, MSW, a family advocate with Kern County Mental Health Dept., who can be reached at (661)868-6109. Also mentioned is a group called NAMI (Nat’l Alliance for the Mentally Ill), which meets in Tehachapi once a month. This is a local, state and national organization providing support, education and advocacy for consumers and family members. For more information about this organization, call (661)822-5391. I apologize for previously misinforming my readers.
Q. I have been sued for paternity by a woman I dated last year after she broke up with her boyfriend of many years. She told me almost from the beginning that she was pregnant by this man. Now, she has sued me for child support. I am not the father of this child and I do not want to pay child support for a child that is not mine. What can I do?
A. You need to respond to the Paternity lawsuit within 30 days from service of process by explaining that you are not the father of the child and that the woman who is suing you admitted to you that she was impregnated by another man. Specify that you want a DNA test to prove that you are not the father. These DNA tests are very accurate and if you are telling the truth, you will be exonerated. Good luck.

Monday, January 5, 2009

Legal Eaze #21 Pregnant/ Collections Agency

Originally Printed: May 4, 2005

Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She operates her law practice from her new office in town, as well her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities. Please forward your questions to maxinedev@msn.com.

Q. I am 16 years old and pregnant. My boyfriend is 18 years old. My parents like him and do not want to press charges against him. My parents and I are worried that the hospital staff at the hospital I go to when it is time to give birth will call the police on my boyfriend. Can the hospital staff do that? Or it is up to my parents?
A. My understanding of criminal law is that no one goes forward with a criminal filing unless there is a complaining victim. Mandated reporting is for child abuse only, not for impregnation of a minor, even if in violation of statutory rape laws. Please note that I am a “civil” general practitioner and only handle minor criminal matters. You would be best served by asking an attorney who handles criminal matters of all kinds.
Q. There is a man from a collection agency who keeps calling me with regards to an old debt dating back over 10 years ago. I have told him to leave me alone but he keeps bothering me at home. Somehow, he found out my boyfriend’s telephone number and he calls me there as well. It is legal for this collection agency to keep calling me like this?
A. I believe the Statute of Limitations on the debt may have expired. This collection agency can no longer collect on the debt. If you had a written contract with regards to this debt, the Statute of Limitations expired four years after you entered the contract, or four years after you made the last payment on the debt, whichever comes later. If you did not have a written contract, then two years is the applicable Statute of Limitations period. The collection agency may be liable for unfair debt collection practices and it would behoove you to take down the name, address and telephone number of this collection agency so that you can obtain court redress at a later date. It would be difficult for you to sue a collection agency if you do not know its name and contact information.