Title: June 28, 2006
Q. I live in an apartment and my car was parked in front of the apartment building. The property management hired a weedwacking service and as the man was using his weedwacker, a rock flew up and hit my windshield, breaking it. I had just parked my car and was walking away from it when it happened. I saw the rock hit my windshield. What can I do?
A. Ask your property management to give you the name of the company that was taking care of the weedwacking. They should be insured for this type of damage. If they are not, then your property management should give information about the building’s property insurance for any damage that occurs on the grounds of the apartment building. You then make a claim with the insurance company. You obviously are going to need at least a couple of estimates on the repair.
Q.My husband and I are grandparents to two wonderful boys whom we have had in our care for approximately ten years. We never petitioned the court for their guardianship. My son, their father, who was awarded custody of his two boys, left them with us. Obviously, this is just an informal arrangement. But we are very attached to these boys and treat them like our own children. It is possible that their father could decide to pick them up some day and take them away from us?
A. Yes, it is possible, since you did not formalize your relationship with these boys through the court. However, if the boys are happy with you, doing well in school and their lives are stable, you could certainly dispute their father’s sudden interest in the children, especially if the boys have been in your care for 10 years. The court is most favorable to keeping the status quo, and if these children have been well taken care of for 10 years, it is very likely that you would be awarded permanent guardianship. You need to realize that you might have to fight your son for custody of the children in court and it might be a costly endeavor, but the best interest of the children is what is most important here, and the court will hopefully realize that you have the best of the children at heart.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880
Monday, March 23, 2009
Legal Eaze #48 Child Custody Jurisdiction/Reimbursement
Title: June 14, 2006
Q. My brother and his wife just had a baby girl a few weeks ago. They live in Florida. His wife came to spend some time with her parents here in California and brought the baby with her. The next thing we know, the wife filed for sole custody of the baby in California and does not plan to go back to Florida. Can she do that?
A. A petition for custody needs to be filed in the Court that has jurisdiction in accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The “home state” means the state in which a child lived with a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child custody proceeding. Obviously the baby is not even six months old yet. Unless “emergency” jurisdiction applies, i.e. there is a genuine “immediate” and “substantial harm” to the child or the mother, the California court will more than likely refuse to make a decision in the case because it does not have jurisdiction over the child. However, if your brother has a violent temper and she fears for her own safety or the safety of the child, then “emergency” jurisdiction would apply and the California court will make a decision either on an ex-parte basis or after a second hearing to allow both parties to prepare their argument in writing.
Q. I bought a carton of Snapple tea bottles from a grocery store (24 bottles were included). A few days later, I picked up a bottle and was getting ready to open it when I noticed some strange green stuff inside the bottle. I grossed me out and I vomited the meal I had just eaten. I returned the bottle to the store and an employee took a report, but nothing was done to reimburse me for the trouble I went through. What can I do?
A. Other than the dinner you lost, were you injured? Did you have to go to the hospital or doctor for mental stress? There is little you can do because your damages are minimal. You could bill the store for the meal you lost. The store where you bought the tea did not manufacture the bottles and it would be up to the manufacturer to reimburse you for the damages you suffered. If I was the owner of the store, I would probably offer you another carton just to appease you. Make sure that the bottle you are about to drink from is still sealed. It is possible that the bottle was “banged” around and the seal was broken. The “green stuff” you saw inside the bottle was probably harmless mold.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880
Q. My brother and his wife just had a baby girl a few weeks ago. They live in Florida. His wife came to spend some time with her parents here in California and brought the baby with her. The next thing we know, the wife filed for sole custody of the baby in California and does not plan to go back to Florida. Can she do that?
A. A petition for custody needs to be filed in the Court that has jurisdiction in accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The “home state” means the state in which a child lived with a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child custody proceeding. Obviously the baby is not even six months old yet. Unless “emergency” jurisdiction applies, i.e. there is a genuine “immediate” and “substantial harm” to the child or the mother, the California court will more than likely refuse to make a decision in the case because it does not have jurisdiction over the child. However, if your brother has a violent temper and she fears for her own safety or the safety of the child, then “emergency” jurisdiction would apply and the California court will make a decision either on an ex-parte basis or after a second hearing to allow both parties to prepare their argument in writing.
Q. I bought a carton of Snapple tea bottles from a grocery store (24 bottles were included). A few days later, I picked up a bottle and was getting ready to open it when I noticed some strange green stuff inside the bottle. I grossed me out and I vomited the meal I had just eaten. I returned the bottle to the store and an employee took a report, but nothing was done to reimburse me for the trouble I went through. What can I do?
A. Other than the dinner you lost, were you injured? Did you have to go to the hospital or doctor for mental stress? There is little you can do because your damages are minimal. You could bill the store for the meal you lost. The store where you bought the tea did not manufacture the bottles and it would be up to the manufacturer to reimburse you for the damages you suffered. If I was the owner of the store, I would probably offer you another carton just to appease you. Make sure that the bottle you are about to drink from is still sealed. It is possible that the bottle was “banged” around and the seal was broken. The “green stuff” you saw inside the bottle was probably harmless mold.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880
Legal Eaze #47 Sub-Contractor Lien/Not Bound by Attorney-Client Privilege
Title: May 24, 2006
Q. I hired a contractor to turn my two-car garage into a three-car garage. The contractor collected a deposit of 10 percent plus a material deposit and the remainder of the contract was to be paid when the work was completed. After completion of the project by a sub-contractor, I paid the contractor the remainder of the contract price. The sub-contractor later informed me that he had not been paid by the contractor and that he was filing a mechanic’s lien on my house. Can he do that?
A. Not unless (1) the sub-contractor served you with a 2-day preliminary notice before he began work, or sometime during or immediately after his work was completed or (2) the sub-contractor had a direct contract with you. If a contractor (as opposed to a sub-contractor) has a direct contract with you, there is no 20-day preliminary notice requirement. The contractor is allowed to file a lien within 90 days of completion of the project and then has 90 days in which to foreclose on the lien, which can be done in small claims court.
Q. I went to a lawyer for a legal consultation and my girlfriend came with me. I discussed a family law matter with him. My girlfriend knows everything about my marital problems. The attorney warned me that although he was bound by the attorney-client privilege, my girlfriend was not. What did he mean by that?
A It means that anything that is discussed in an attorney’s office is a privileged conversation and the attorney cannot discuss it with anyone else who is not affiliated with his own office. However, your girlfriend is not an attorney and she is not bound to secrecy. She does not have a duty to keep what was discussed in her presence a secret. As a result, if you ever have a fallout with her, she might discuss your private affairs with anyone she chooses to discuss them with and there will be nothing you can do about it. Hence, when you go to your attorney’s office, it is not always a good idea to bring someone with you. I realize that you may feel the need for mental support from a friend, but that defeats the purpose of the attorney-client privilege. Anyone else present in the attorney’s office, other than his staff, is not bound by that privilege.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.
Q. I hired a contractor to turn my two-car garage into a three-car garage. The contractor collected a deposit of 10 percent plus a material deposit and the remainder of the contract was to be paid when the work was completed. After completion of the project by a sub-contractor, I paid the contractor the remainder of the contract price. The sub-contractor later informed me that he had not been paid by the contractor and that he was filing a mechanic’s lien on my house. Can he do that?
A. Not unless (1) the sub-contractor served you with a 2-day preliminary notice before he began work, or sometime during or immediately after his work was completed or (2) the sub-contractor had a direct contract with you. If a contractor (as opposed to a sub-contractor) has a direct contract with you, there is no 20-day preliminary notice requirement. The contractor is allowed to file a lien within 90 days of completion of the project and then has 90 days in which to foreclose on the lien, which can be done in small claims court.
Q. I went to a lawyer for a legal consultation and my girlfriend came with me. I discussed a family law matter with him. My girlfriend knows everything about my marital problems. The attorney warned me that although he was bound by the attorney-client privilege, my girlfriend was not. What did he mean by that?
A It means that anything that is discussed in an attorney’s office is a privileged conversation and the attorney cannot discuss it with anyone else who is not affiliated with his own office. However, your girlfriend is not an attorney and she is not bound to secrecy. She does not have a duty to keep what was discussed in her presence a secret. As a result, if you ever have a fallout with her, she might discuss your private affairs with anyone she chooses to discuss them with and there will be nothing you can do about it. Hence, when you go to your attorney’s office, it is not always a good idea to bring someone with you. I realize that you may feel the need for mental support from a friend, but that defeats the purpose of the attorney-client privilege. Anyone else present in the attorney’s office, other than his staff, is not bound by that privilege.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.
Legal Eaze #46 Unlawful Detainer/ Apartment Lease Agreement
Title: May 10, 2006
Q. How long does an unlawful detainer lawsuit take once it has been filed?
A. Once the case has been filed, the entire process from start to finish could take anywhere from 30 to 45 days, depending on whether the tenant files an answer to the Unlawful Detainer Complaint. An answer is due within 5 days from the time the complaint is served on the tenant. If the attorney representing the landlord is on top of everything, a Memorandum to set the case for trial is filed with the court immediately after the answer is received and the court will set the case for trial usually within two to three weeks. Once the case is tried, a judgment will be rendered by the court. If the tenant loses the case, he or she will have a short period of time within which to move out, usually one week. If the tenant does not move out in time, the sheriff will post a notice to move out within one week. If the tenant is still not out one week later, the sheriff will escort the tenant out, giving back possession of the unit the landlord. Unlawful detainer actions have priority because of the urgency of the landlord to get back the unit occupied by the tenant. Every day the tenant is in possession costs the landlord money.
Q. Can I be evicted for having another family member reside in my apartment when the manager is aware of the additional person?
A It depends on your lease agreement. If the lease agreement does not mention how many people are to live in the premises, then it does not matter how many people live there. If the lease agreement specifies how many persons are to reside on the premises, but it is not enforced, just make sure that you obey all rules and regulations and the additional person might not be a bother to the landlord. Although the manager is aware of the additional person, if this person does not cause any problems or conflicts, an eviction should not be feared. However, if the present manager is removed and another manager takes his place, then beware. The safe thing to do is to get formal permission from the landlord to have that additional family member living on your premises. The lease could be reformed, or that family member could simply be added to the existing lease.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.
Q. How long does an unlawful detainer lawsuit take once it has been filed?
A. Once the case has been filed, the entire process from start to finish could take anywhere from 30 to 45 days, depending on whether the tenant files an answer to the Unlawful Detainer Complaint. An answer is due within 5 days from the time the complaint is served on the tenant. If the attorney representing the landlord is on top of everything, a Memorandum to set the case for trial is filed with the court immediately after the answer is received and the court will set the case for trial usually within two to three weeks. Once the case is tried, a judgment will be rendered by the court. If the tenant loses the case, he or she will have a short period of time within which to move out, usually one week. If the tenant does not move out in time, the sheriff will post a notice to move out within one week. If the tenant is still not out one week later, the sheriff will escort the tenant out, giving back possession of the unit the landlord. Unlawful detainer actions have priority because of the urgency of the landlord to get back the unit occupied by the tenant. Every day the tenant is in possession costs the landlord money.
Q. Can I be evicted for having another family member reside in my apartment when the manager is aware of the additional person?
A It depends on your lease agreement. If the lease agreement does not mention how many people are to live in the premises, then it does not matter how many people live there. If the lease agreement specifies how many persons are to reside on the premises, but it is not enforced, just make sure that you obey all rules and regulations and the additional person might not be a bother to the landlord. Although the manager is aware of the additional person, if this person does not cause any problems or conflicts, an eviction should not be feared. However, if the present manager is removed and another manager takes his place, then beware. The safe thing to do is to get formal permission from the landlord to have that additional family member living on your premises. The lease could be reformed, or that family member could simply be added to the existing lease.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.
Legal Eaze #45 Vacant Lot/Lien
Title: April 5, 2006
Q. I am one of six owners of a vacant lot. Five of the six are ready to sell. How should we proceed to make this happen?
A. If the sixth party is adamant not to sell his interest, you may need to file an action for partition. A partition is the division among several persons of lands that belong to them as co-owners, either by physically dividing the property into as many portions as there are shares to be distributed among the respective owners, or by selling the property and distribution the proceeds among the owners according to their interest. In the absence of a waiver, a tenant in common or joint tenants has an absolute right to sever his or her interests from those of the cotenants. Partition may be effected wither by voluntary agreement of the co-owners or by judgment in an action undertaken for that purpose. The object is to enable each party to obtain title to and use of some definite portion of the property in severalty. There is no transfer of title; rather, property to which the parties already have title is divided among them. Thus partition transforms the right to common possession of the entire parcel into a right of exclusive possession of some portion of the property held in severalty. Methods of partition are as follows: (1) physical division of the property (2) sale of the property and division of the proceeds (3) partition by appraisal under which any of the parties may acquire the interests of the others at their value as determined in a court-ordered appraisal.
Q. I put my son on the title to my house as joint tenant because I wanted my house to go to him when I die. He got into a car accident and had no insurance. The other driver obtained a judgment against my son because he caused the accident and I fear that a lien is being placed on my residence. What can I do?
A You can do nothing. Adding your children to the title has serious consequences, such as the one you find yourself in. Your son could have inherited the house through a Revocable Living Trust where title to the house transfers to your son at your death and not before. Children sometimes get into trouble and if they are on title, any of their creditors can lien your house, because they own it too. Let it be a lesson to you and remove your son from title as soon as possible, if he assents to it. If he does not want his name to be removed from title, you are stuck.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-
Q. I am one of six owners of a vacant lot. Five of the six are ready to sell. How should we proceed to make this happen?
A. If the sixth party is adamant not to sell his interest, you may need to file an action for partition. A partition is the division among several persons of lands that belong to them as co-owners, either by physically dividing the property into as many portions as there are shares to be distributed among the respective owners, or by selling the property and distribution the proceeds among the owners according to their interest. In the absence of a waiver, a tenant in common or joint tenants has an absolute right to sever his or her interests from those of the cotenants. Partition may be effected wither by voluntary agreement of the co-owners or by judgment in an action undertaken for that purpose. The object is to enable each party to obtain title to and use of some definite portion of the property in severalty. There is no transfer of title; rather, property to which the parties already have title is divided among them. Thus partition transforms the right to common possession of the entire parcel into a right of exclusive possession of some portion of the property held in severalty. Methods of partition are as follows: (1) physical division of the property (2) sale of the property and division of the proceeds (3) partition by appraisal under which any of the parties may acquire the interests of the others at their value as determined in a court-ordered appraisal.
Q. I put my son on the title to my house as joint tenant because I wanted my house to go to him when I die. He got into a car accident and had no insurance. The other driver obtained a judgment against my son because he caused the accident and I fear that a lien is being placed on my residence. What can I do?
A You can do nothing. Adding your children to the title has serious consequences, such as the one you find yourself in. Your son could have inherited the house through a Revocable Living Trust where title to the house transfers to your son at your death and not before. Children sometimes get into trouble and if they are on title, any of their creditors can lien your house, because they own it too. Let it be a lesson to you and remove your son from title as soon as possible, if he assents to it. If he does not want his name to be removed from title, you are stuck.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-
Legal Eaze #44 Daughter Drivers License/ Defamation
Title: April 19, 2006
Q. My 16-year old daughter just got her driver’s license. Can she drive her siblings to school?
A. Vehicle Code Section 12814.6 just took effect on Jan. 1, 2006. It reads as follows: A driver’s license issued to a person at least 16 years of age but under 18 years of age shall be issued a “provisional” driver’s license, and it is subject to all of the following restrictions: During the first 12 months after issuance of a provisional license, the licensee may not do any of the following under accompanied and supervised by a license driver who is the licensee’s parent or guardian, a licensed driver who is 25 years of age of older, or a licensed or certified driving instructor. (a) Drive between the hours of 11 pm and 5 am. (b) transport passengers who are under 20 years of age. This means that if her siblings are under the age of 20 years old, she cannot have them as passengers.
Q. An ex-girlfriend of mine has spread nasty rumors about why we split up. She said to others that I left her because she was pregnant and that she had to have an abortion because I would not help her after the birth. I am sterile and cannot make any woman pregnant. I left her because I did not love her anymore. What can I do about this?
A Defamation is a false statement that is told about another person that harms that person’s reputation in the social or business community. To be held legally liable for defamation requires specific elements to be proven in court. Practically speaking, if anyone could be successfully sued just because they had some false and embarrassing statements said about them then many forms of media and political campaigning would have been sued out of existence some time ago. Defamation describes both “libel” and “slander”. Slander usually refers to defamation that is only spoken between people and libel specifically refers to defamation that is printed or written. Slander is typically more difficult to prove because there is no recording. For you to sue, the following requirements must be met: (1) it needs to be “published” or communicated in some form to a third party. (2) The statement must identify the specific individual who is claiming the defamation. (3) The statement must be false. (4) A plaintiff must also prove an appropriate level of fault on the part of the defendant who made the defamatory statements. This depends on whether the plaintiff is a public figure or a private figure. (5) Lastly, the plaintiff must have suffered some damages which can be remedied by the courts.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.
Q. My 16-year old daughter just got her driver’s license. Can she drive her siblings to school?
A. Vehicle Code Section 12814.6 just took effect on Jan. 1, 2006. It reads as follows: A driver’s license issued to a person at least 16 years of age but under 18 years of age shall be issued a “provisional” driver’s license, and it is subject to all of the following restrictions: During the first 12 months after issuance of a provisional license, the licensee may not do any of the following under accompanied and supervised by a license driver who is the licensee’s parent or guardian, a licensed driver who is 25 years of age of older, or a licensed or certified driving instructor. (a) Drive between the hours of 11 pm and 5 am. (b) transport passengers who are under 20 years of age. This means that if her siblings are under the age of 20 years old, she cannot have them as passengers.
Q. An ex-girlfriend of mine has spread nasty rumors about why we split up. She said to others that I left her because she was pregnant and that she had to have an abortion because I would not help her after the birth. I am sterile and cannot make any woman pregnant. I left her because I did not love her anymore. What can I do about this?
A Defamation is a false statement that is told about another person that harms that person’s reputation in the social or business community. To be held legally liable for defamation requires specific elements to be proven in court. Practically speaking, if anyone could be successfully sued just because they had some false and embarrassing statements said about them then many forms of media and political campaigning would have been sued out of existence some time ago. Defamation describes both “libel” and “slander”. Slander usually refers to defamation that is only spoken between people and libel specifically refers to defamation that is printed or written. Slander is typically more difficult to prove because there is no recording. For you to sue, the following requirements must be met: (1) it needs to be “published” or communicated in some form to a third party. (2) The statement must identify the specific individual who is claiming the defamation. (3) The statement must be false. (4) A plaintiff must also prove an appropriate level of fault on the part of the defendant who made the defamatory statements. This depends on whether the plaintiff is a public figure or a private figure. (5) Lastly, the plaintiff must have suffered some damages which can be remedied by the courts.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.
Legal Eaze # 41 Legal Separation/Small Claims Court
Title: March 22, 2006
Q. What is a legal separation?
A. When parties are uncertain as to whether or not they want to terminate/dissolve their marriage, they can file a proceeding for “legal separation” instead of “dissolution of marriage”. Marital rights and financial responsibilities may be decided by the family law court without dissolving the marriage. The parties can obtain a Judgment of Legal Separation but that does not terminate their marital status, in other words, they are still husband and wife even though legally they have divided all of the community property estate and have resolved child support and spousal support. Legal separation is an alternative to divorce and is generally sought out by the parties when there is breakdown of the marriage. It is sometimes used for religious or personal reasons, such as in order to retain eligibility for medical insurance that would otherwise be lost by a termination of the marriage. This can be a very important consideration where a spouse has a preexisting medical condition for which new coverage would not be obtainable.
Q. How do I file a Small Claims Court case?
A Most state courthouses have a Small Claims court Division. However, you must sue a defendant in the proper court. Generally, you must sue in the city where the defendant lives, or where they agreed to the disputed contract with you, or where the action took place that led to your injury. Businesses can also be sued in any city where they do business. The advantages of suing in Small Claims Court are 1) it's quick 2) it's cheap 3) it's informal 4) there are no lawyers. The disadvantages are 1) if you are the plaintiff and you are not happy with the Court's decision, you cannot appeal 2) no lawyers: if you are unable to present your case persuasively, you may lose. It sometimes helps to have a high-priced mouthpiece used to represent a party. You file your claim and serve the defendant. Have it served by someone other than you. Anyone over the age of 18 can do. Certified mail is sometimes used. The court clerk can do it for a small fee. But if the defendant knows it's a lawsuit, he/she may not sign it. Once served, you must attend the trial hearing. Make sure you have all your photographs and/or documents pertaining to the dispute. Now that you are in court, be clear and concise because the Judge does not have all to listen to you. The Plaintiff goes first, then the defendant. The Judge may ask each of you some questions, then will make a decision.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.
Q. What is a legal separation?
A. When parties are uncertain as to whether or not they want to terminate/dissolve their marriage, they can file a proceeding for “legal separation” instead of “dissolution of marriage”. Marital rights and financial responsibilities may be decided by the family law court without dissolving the marriage. The parties can obtain a Judgment of Legal Separation but that does not terminate their marital status, in other words, they are still husband and wife even though legally they have divided all of the community property estate and have resolved child support and spousal support. Legal separation is an alternative to divorce and is generally sought out by the parties when there is breakdown of the marriage. It is sometimes used for religious or personal reasons, such as in order to retain eligibility for medical insurance that would otherwise be lost by a termination of the marriage. This can be a very important consideration where a spouse has a preexisting medical condition for which new coverage would not be obtainable.
Q. How do I file a Small Claims Court case?
A Most state courthouses have a Small Claims court Division. However, you must sue a defendant in the proper court. Generally, you must sue in the city where the defendant lives, or where they agreed to the disputed contract with you, or where the action took place that led to your injury. Businesses can also be sued in any city where they do business. The advantages of suing in Small Claims Court are 1) it's quick 2) it's cheap 3) it's informal 4) there are no lawyers. The disadvantages are 1) if you are the plaintiff and you are not happy with the Court's decision, you cannot appeal 2) no lawyers: if you are unable to present your case persuasively, you may lose. It sometimes helps to have a high-priced mouthpiece used to represent a party. You file your claim and serve the defendant. Have it served by someone other than you. Anyone over the age of 18 can do. Certified mail is sometimes used. The court clerk can do it for a small fee. But if the defendant knows it's a lawsuit, he/she may not sign it. Once served, you must attend the trial hearing. Make sure you have all your photographs and/or documents pertaining to the dispute. Now that you are in court, be clear and concise because the Judge does not have all to listen to you. The Plaintiff goes first, then the defendant. The Judge may ask each of you some questions, then will make a decision.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)