Title: July 4, 2007
Q. There are an awful lot of products being recalled. Why is this happening so much nowadays?
A. A company is recalling a product because principals of the company discovered some safety issue with the product being recalled. It is basically an effort to limit liability for corporate negligence, to avoid costly legal penalties imposed by some government agency overseeing the type of products being manufactured and to curb bad publicity. Of course, this can be very costly because it often entails replacing the recalled product or paying for damages caused by using the product in question. United States has specific requirements in regard to product recalls. Safety-related recalls can be voluntarily initiated by the manufacturer, or made compulsory by a government agency if the risk is significant to consumers and if it is in the consumer’s best interest. Lately, we’ve had a recall on food items produced in Northern California. These food items had to be recalled because not only did they cause death, but also caused hundreds of people to become violently ill from consuming the food. Recalls of cars, tires, children toys and canned food are common. We must return any items which are the subject of a recall immediately. There will be reimbursement of the money paid to buy the product by the store or the manufacturer.
Q. I believe there is toxic mold or mildew in my brand new house. My children are suffering from various illnesses because of it. I have complained about it to the builder, but nothing is being done about it. I think the house was insufficiently covered when it rained last winter during the construction phase and now mold is present in the attic and growing. What can I do?
A. Molds are ubiquitous in nature, and mold spores are a common component of household dust. The term toxic mold is sometimes used to refer to mold-related indoor air quality problems. Exposure to significant quantities or mold spores can cause allergic reactions. Some species or molds can be toxic to humans or animals. You should contact a company specialized in conducting mold inspections. If toxic mold is found, send the report to the builder. The builder may be responsible if you are still within your warranty period, or even outside it, depending on what caused the toxic mold, if any. A lawsuit may be in order if the builder continues to ignore your plea for held.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 14 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880
Showing posts with label reimbursement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label reimbursement. Show all posts
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Monday, March 23, 2009
Legal Eaze #48 Child Custody Jurisdiction/Reimbursement
Title: June 14, 2006
Q. My brother and his wife just had a baby girl a few weeks ago. They live in Florida. His wife came to spend some time with her parents here in California and brought the baby with her. The next thing we know, the wife filed for sole custody of the baby in California and does not plan to go back to Florida. Can she do that?
A. A petition for custody needs to be filed in the Court that has jurisdiction in accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The “home state” means the state in which a child lived with a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child custody proceeding. Obviously the baby is not even six months old yet. Unless “emergency” jurisdiction applies, i.e. there is a genuine “immediate” and “substantial harm” to the child or the mother, the California court will more than likely refuse to make a decision in the case because it does not have jurisdiction over the child. However, if your brother has a violent temper and she fears for her own safety or the safety of the child, then “emergency” jurisdiction would apply and the California court will make a decision either on an ex-parte basis or after a second hearing to allow both parties to prepare their argument in writing.
Q. I bought a carton of Snapple tea bottles from a grocery store (24 bottles were included). A few days later, I picked up a bottle and was getting ready to open it when I noticed some strange green stuff inside the bottle. I grossed me out and I vomited the meal I had just eaten. I returned the bottle to the store and an employee took a report, but nothing was done to reimburse me for the trouble I went through. What can I do?
A. Other than the dinner you lost, were you injured? Did you have to go to the hospital or doctor for mental stress? There is little you can do because your damages are minimal. You could bill the store for the meal you lost. The store where you bought the tea did not manufacture the bottles and it would be up to the manufacturer to reimburse you for the damages you suffered. If I was the owner of the store, I would probably offer you another carton just to appease you. Make sure that the bottle you are about to drink from is still sealed. It is possible that the bottle was “banged” around and the seal was broken. The “green stuff” you saw inside the bottle was probably harmless mold.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880
Q. My brother and his wife just had a baby girl a few weeks ago. They live in Florida. His wife came to spend some time with her parents here in California and brought the baby with her. The next thing we know, the wife filed for sole custody of the baby in California and does not plan to go back to Florida. Can she do that?
A. A petition for custody needs to be filed in the Court that has jurisdiction in accordance with the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Enforcement Act (UCCJEA). The “home state” means the state in which a child lived with a parent for at least six consecutive months immediately before the commencement of a child custody proceeding. Obviously the baby is not even six months old yet. Unless “emergency” jurisdiction applies, i.e. there is a genuine “immediate” and “substantial harm” to the child or the mother, the California court will more than likely refuse to make a decision in the case because it does not have jurisdiction over the child. However, if your brother has a violent temper and she fears for her own safety or the safety of the child, then “emergency” jurisdiction would apply and the California court will make a decision either on an ex-parte basis or after a second hearing to allow both parties to prepare their argument in writing.
Q. I bought a carton of Snapple tea bottles from a grocery store (24 bottles were included). A few days later, I picked up a bottle and was getting ready to open it when I noticed some strange green stuff inside the bottle. I grossed me out and I vomited the meal I had just eaten. I returned the bottle to the store and an employee took a report, but nothing was done to reimburse me for the trouble I went through. What can I do?
A. Other than the dinner you lost, were you injured? Did you have to go to the hospital or doctor for mental stress? There is little you can do because your damages are minimal. You could bill the store for the meal you lost. The store where you bought the tea did not manufacture the bottles and it would be up to the manufacturer to reimburse you for the damages you suffered. If I was the owner of the store, I would probably offer you another carton just to appease you. Make sure that the bottle you are about to drink from is still sealed. It is possible that the bottle was “banged” around and the seal was broken. The “green stuff” you saw inside the bottle was probably harmless mold.
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880
Wednesday, December 31, 2008
Legal Eaze #5 Tree Roof Damage/ Sick Puppy
Originally Printed: September 1, 2004
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 12 years of experience. She moved to Tehachapi in June 2003 and resides in Alpine Forest. She operates her law practice from her home office and also has a satellite office in Lancaster. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities.
Q. My neighbor has a tree with large branches overhanging my roof. In the past, some of these branches have caused damage to my roof on windy days. I have asked my neighbor to do something about his tree, but he refuses to do anything. What can I do?
A. You have the right to abate this nuisance by cutting off the offending branches. However, you cannot cut off more than necessary and you must be careful not to cause an imbalance that will eventually cause the tree to die or to fall down to the other side. Obviously, it would be to your neighbor’s advantage to cooperate in hiring a professional to deal with the tree. I would suggest that you contact an attorney to write a strong letter to your neighbor and make him aware of his liability for the damage caused to your roof and to reach a consensus as to how the offending branches should be removed. The cost of hiring a tree professional should be borne by the owner of the tree.
Q. I purchased a cute puppy from a pet store. Two weeks later, it was diagnosed with Parvo disease. I was expensive to save the puppy’s life. What should I do?
A. If a licensed veterinarian has made a written diagnosis within 15 days after the dog was purchased to the effect that the dog became ill due to any pre-existing illness or disease, you may return the dog to the store for a refund of the purchase price and reimbursement of reasonable veterinary fees for diagnosis and treatment in an amount not to exceed the original purchase price. As an alternative, you may get another dog of your choice and of equal value, plus reimbursement of the veterinary fees. If you choose to keep the dog, you can still be reimbursed for reasonable veterinary fees in an amount not to exceed 150% of the original purchase price of the dog. Lastly, if the dog dies as a result of the same illness or disease, regardless of the date of its death, obtain a refund for the purchase price, or a replacement dog of equivalent value and reimbursement for veterinary fees in an amount not to exceed the purchase price of the dog. The same goes for a dog with a congenital or hereditary condition diagnosed by a veterinarian to suffer or have died from this condition within one year of its purchase.
Forward questions to maxinedev@msn.com , drop questions at the Tehachapi News, located at 411 N. Mill St., or send them to POB 1840, Tehachapi, CA 93581
Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 12 years of experience. She moved to Tehachapi in June 2003 and resides in Alpine Forest. She operates her law practice from her home office and also has a satellite office in Lancaster. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers, to the best of her abilities.
Q. My neighbor has a tree with large branches overhanging my roof. In the past, some of these branches have caused damage to my roof on windy days. I have asked my neighbor to do something about his tree, but he refuses to do anything. What can I do?
A. You have the right to abate this nuisance by cutting off the offending branches. However, you cannot cut off more than necessary and you must be careful not to cause an imbalance that will eventually cause the tree to die or to fall down to the other side. Obviously, it would be to your neighbor’s advantage to cooperate in hiring a professional to deal with the tree. I would suggest that you contact an attorney to write a strong letter to your neighbor and make him aware of his liability for the damage caused to your roof and to reach a consensus as to how the offending branches should be removed. The cost of hiring a tree professional should be borne by the owner of the tree.
Q. I purchased a cute puppy from a pet store. Two weeks later, it was diagnosed with Parvo disease. I was expensive to save the puppy’s life. What should I do?
A. If a licensed veterinarian has made a written diagnosis within 15 days after the dog was purchased to the effect that the dog became ill due to any pre-existing illness or disease, you may return the dog to the store for a refund of the purchase price and reimbursement of reasonable veterinary fees for diagnosis and treatment in an amount not to exceed the original purchase price. As an alternative, you may get another dog of your choice and of equal value, plus reimbursement of the veterinary fees. If you choose to keep the dog, you can still be reimbursed for reasonable veterinary fees in an amount not to exceed 150% of the original purchase price of the dog. Lastly, if the dog dies as a result of the same illness or disease, regardless of the date of its death, obtain a refund for the purchase price, or a replacement dog of equivalent value and reimbursement for veterinary fees in an amount not to exceed the purchase price of the dog. The same goes for a dog with a congenital or hereditary condition diagnosed by a veterinarian to suffer or have died from this condition within one year of its purchase.
Forward questions to maxinedev@msn.com , drop questions at the Tehachapi News, located at 411 N. Mill St., or send them to POB 1840, Tehachapi, CA 93581
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)