Showing posts with label breach of contract. Show all posts
Showing posts with label breach of contract. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Legal Eaze #76 Non-Competition Clause/Not Credited For Made Up Time

Title: September 3, 2007

Q. My brother bought a “roach coach” business. He paid good money for 3 trucks, the routes and included a no-compete clause so that the company he bought the business from would not get back into the same business within 5 years from the sale. That business is now back in business, operating on the same routes that were sold to my brother only 2 years ago, and taking business away from my brother. What should he do?

A. I believe your brother should sue that company. Usually non-competition clauses are enforceable as long as they are not overly restrictive. For example, not permitting the operators of that company to re-open in the same area the business was previously operating simply protects your brother’s investment in purchasing the company. The enforcement of non-compete clauses in business-sale contracts depends upon the notion that part of what the buyer is paying for is the goodwill of the business (defined as the expectation of future public patronage) and by competing, the seller is unfairly undermining the value of the goodwill for which he was paid. Here your facts make it clear that part of what your brother bought and paid for was “the route”, and if the seller is going after his old customers on the route, that would violate a typical non-compete clause and could be the basis for a successful lawsuit.

Q. One of my co-workers took off a half day last week. He made it up this week. He was then told by our supervisor that because he failed to notify him of the switch, he would not only be docked for the time he missed, but would also not be credited for the made-up time. Is this legal?

A. The employer must live up to its agreement with the employees when a worker needs time off. The contract covering a particular pay or benefits provision does not necessarily have to be written down. However, if there is a written policy, a past practice, a general understanding, that alone may be deemed to be the contract between the parties as to that particular practice. Hence, a particular practice will generally not be against the law most of the time, but failure to honor a practice in an arbitrary or discriminatory manner is likely to be a breach of contract, a civil wrong addressable not through the Labor Commission but through a private lawsuit.

Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 14 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661) 825-8880

Monday, March 16, 2009

Legal Eaze #41 car brakes/ credit card collection agency/ funeral

Title: February 22, 2006

Q. I helped my friend over the weekend to work on his car brakes. He gave me a six-pack of beer for helping him. My friend got in an accident and claimed his brakes failed. Am I responsible?

A. Unless you are a certified car mechanic and had a contract with your friend to fix the brakes, for which you got paid a six-pack of beer, you are not responsible for the accident.

Q. I have been sued by a collection agency trying to collect a credit card debt that is at least 10 years old, if not older. I did use the credit card but I lost my job and had no money to make the monthly payments. The debt grew and grew until it became totally unmanageable for me. Now, this collection agency wants triple what the debt was originally. What do I do?

A You need to answer the complaint by generally denying the complaint allegations. Then as an affirmative defense, you need to mention that the cause of action for breach of contract is barred by the statute of limitations as well as any other causes of action. This means that the debt is too old to be collected on. The statute of limitations on credit card debt is four years after your last payment or the last communication between the credit card and you.

Q. My mother died about one month ago. Of course, I contacted a funeral home for them to handle the cremation of my mother’s body. In order for my mother’s body to be cremated, they told me I had to purchase a casket. I was grieving and not in my right mind and I paid them almost $4,500 for a casket, but now that I think of it, why does a body need a casket to be cremated in? That makes no sense at all. I believe I was defrauded. What do you think?

A I agree. The Funeral Rule requires funeral providers to give you an accurate, itemized price list about funeral goods and services. To require the purchase of a casket for cremation is in direct violation of this rule, and this funeral provider will be subjected to a penalty up to $10,000 for this egregious act. You need to report this to the authorities and hire an attorney to file a lawsuit against the funeral provider. It is possible that you can write a letter and mention that you will file a lawsuit against the company unless they give you your money back for the violation if you want to avoid the time and aggravation associated with a lawsuit.

Maxine de Villefranche is an attorney and civil general practitioner with 13 years of experience. She practices law from her Tehachapi office as well as her Lancaster satellite office. She will answer legal questions posed to her by the readers to the best of her abilities. Email your questions to maxinedev@msn.com or fax to (661)825-8880.